[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210122159.GJ29580@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:51:59 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] dma: add channel request API that supports deferred
probe
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:04:22AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>
> dma_request_slave_channel() simply returns NULL whenever DMA channel
> lookup fails. Lookup could fail for two distinct reasons:
>
> a) No DMA specification exists for the channel name.
> This includes situations where no DMA specifications exist at all, or
> other general lookup problems.
>
> b) A DMA specification does exist, yet the driver for that channel is not
> yet registered.
>
> Case (b) should trigger deferred probe in client drivers. However, since
> they have no way to differentiate the two situations, it cannot.
>
> Implement new function dma_request_slave_channel_reason(), which performs
> identically to dma_request_slave_channel(), except that it returns an
> error-pointer rather than NULL, which allows callers to detect when
> deferred probe should occur.
>
> Eventually, all drivers should be converted to this new API, the old API
> removed, and the new API renamed to the more desirable name. This patch
> doesn't convert the existing API and all drivers in one go, since some
> drivers call dma_request_slave_channel() then dma_request_channel() if
> that fails. That would require either modifying dma_request_channel() in
> the same way, or adding extra error-handling code to all affected
> drivers, and there are close to 100 drivers using the other API, rather
> than just the 15-20 or so that use dma_request_slave_channel(), which
> might be tenable in a single patch.
>
> acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name() doesn't currently implement
> deferred probe. It should, but this will be addressed later.
>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Applied, to topic/defer_probe, this wont be rebased so feel free to merge
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists