lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210161945.GA23086@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:19:45 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, mingo@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	jacob.w.shin@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, hpa@...or.com, tgl@...ain.invalid,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sherry.hurwitz@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len >
	HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8

On 12/10, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:11:06AM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com wrote:
> > @@ -279,7 +260,16 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* Len */
> > +	info->mask = 0;
> > +
> >  	switch (bp->attr.bp_len) {
> > +	default:
> > +		if (!is_power_of_2(bp->attr.bp_len))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		if (!cpu_has_bpext)
> > +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +		info->mask = bp->attr.bp_len - 1;
> > +		/* fall through */
>
> So, that's perhaps just personal preference but having the default on
> top of the switch makes things very confusing. Can't we put the above
> in the end of the switch instead?

Then "fall through" won't work ;)

> > @@ -314,11 +303,11 @@ int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > -	ret = -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	switch (info->len) {
> >  	case X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1:
> >  		align = 0;
> > +		if (info->mask)
> > +			align = info->mask;
>
> Confused, I thought mask is set only when length is above 8?

Yes. But we need the info->len for hw anyway. if mask != 0 then
len == X86_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1 and it is still used by encode_dr7().
Note that it is not the length in bytes, it is the magic x86 code.

->bp_len is the length.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ