[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210162229.GB23086@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:22:29 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, mingo@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
jacob.w.shin@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
acme@...stprotocols.net, hpa@...or.com, tgl@...ain.invalid,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sherry.hurwitz@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: allow user to specify hardware
breakpoint bp_len
On 12/10, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:11:07AM -0500, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com wrote:
> > @@ -525,14 +525,11 @@ int parse_events_add_breakpoint(struct list_head *list, int *idx,
> > if (parse_breakpoint_type(type, &attr))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * We should find a nice way to override the access length
> > - * Provide some defaults for now
> > - */
> > - if (attr.bp_type == HW_BREAKPOINT_X)
> > - attr.bp_len = sizeof(long);
> > - else
> > - attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
> > + /* Provide some defaults if len is not specified */
> > + if (!len)
> > + len = attr.bp_type == HW_BREAKPOINT_X ? sizeof(long) :
> > + HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
>
> Why is LEN_4 affected in the type?
Hmm, what do you mean?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists