[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000142ddb4d14d-76263c67-59fa-474b-97b2-deae3a92cf69-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:11:24 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > as we don't want to expand percpu ops without doing proper debugging.
>
> Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree.
> Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86?
If you do that then you need to also pick up the patches in between
otherwise the debug functions will get quite loud.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists