[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00000142ddb6d07d-f77cfa15-55a5-4806-891e-2d57894fc46b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:13:35 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] percpu: Add raw_cpu_ops
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yeah, trying to figure out which should go through which tree.
> > Christoph, should I also pickup 14? Or can that go through x86?
>
> Well, it appears to have dependencies so I doubt it can be kept
> separate. In any case, provided all debugging is properly productized:
13/14 can be just merged. There are no dependencies on earlier patches.
If you want to merge 18 then you would need to pick up also 15-17.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists