linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/13] staging/lustre/llite: remove ll_d_root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131211023238.GA10365@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:32:38 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lai Siyao <laisiyao@...mcloud.com>,
	Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@...el.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] staging/lustre/llite: remove ll_d_root_ops

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:56:58PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> From: Lai Siyao <laisiyao@...mcloud.com>
> 
> Mnt root dentry will never be revalidated, but its d_op->d_compare
> will be called for its children, to simplify code, we use the same
> ll_d_ops as normal dentries.
> But its attribute may be invalid before access, this won't cause
> any issue because it always exists, and the only operation depends
> on its attribute is .permission, which has revalidated it in lustre
> code.
> 
> So it's okay to remove ll_d_root_ops, and remove unnecessary checks
> in lookup/revalidate/statahead.

This breaks the build.

It's as if you aren't testing this.

I'm really tired of this, I really don't want to take any more patches
from you for a while, as I dread them every time I see a series sent by
you for this codebase.

ugh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/