[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+a=Yy5dRDD3ZLf-q5y5-UGn4RkRkgZQRDsKpaOYbVMaEFXhmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:23:12 +0800
From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lai Siyao <laisiyao@...mcloud.com>,
Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] staging/lustre/llite: remove ll_d_root_ops
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:56:58PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> From: Lai Siyao <laisiyao@...mcloud.com>
>>
>> Mnt root dentry will never be revalidated, but its d_op->d_compare
>> will be called for its children, to simplify code, we use the same
>> ll_d_ops as normal dentries.
>> But its attribute may be invalid before access, this won't cause
>> any issue because it always exists, and the only operation depends
>> on its attribute is .permission, which has revalidated it in lustre
>> code.
>>
>> So it's okay to remove ll_d_root_ops, and remove unnecessary checks
>> in lookup/revalidate/statahead.
>
> This breaks the build.
>
> It's as if you aren't testing this.
>
err... I tested the series as a whole but it turns out this breakage
got fixed in the next patch. Looks like I should really have tested
every single patch instead.
sorry...
> I'm really tired of this, I really don't want to take any more patches
> from you for a while, as I dread them every time I see a series sent by
> you for this codebase.
>
I'll give you a break then... sorry for getting you annoyed.
Thanks,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists