[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131211075117.GA24559@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:51:17 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>
Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
Arto Merilainen <amerilainen@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpu: host1x: clk_round_rate() can return a zero upon
error
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 06:00:12PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate() as
> errors. This is needed since subsequent patches will convert
> clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather than a
> signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher than
> (2^31)-1 Hz.
>
> Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of zero
> will be considered a error. All other values will be considered valid
> rates. The comparison against values less than 0 is kept to preserve
> the correct behavior in the meantime.
Shouldn't it be an error when the result is not within sensible limits
instead? What do you do with a rate of 1Hz?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists