[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131213105023.67e45640@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64, jump label: optimize jump label
implementation
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:41:04 +0000
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > +#include <asm/jump_label.h>
> > +#include <asm/insn.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>
> Slightly worrying... this should be CONFIG_HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, right? How did
> you manage to test this code?
In <linux/jump_label.h> we have:
#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
[...]
# include <asm/jump_label.h>
# define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
#endif /* CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO && CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists