linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V10 05/14] xen/pvh: balloon and grant changes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:51:27 +0000
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<george.dunlap@...citrix.com>, <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>,
	<mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>, <tim@....org>, <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 05/14] xen/pvh: balloon and grant changes.

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > > > These changes to balloon.c are similar to my patch but:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - they don't prevent set_phys_to_machine from being called by
> > > > > > increase_reservation for auto_translated guests
> > > > > 
> > > > > <nods>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - they don't prevent wasteful balloon_scratch_page from being allocated
> > > > > > for auto_translated guests
> > > > > 
> > > > > <nods>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think that it would be best to take my patch instead.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Lets focus the review on your patch then and have it part of this
> > > > > series. 
> > > > 
> > > > OK, but keep in mind that Xen on ARMv8 is currently broken without that
> > > > patch.
> > > 
> > > Hm. We could have another patch to just disable BALLOON on ARMv8 :-)
> > > 
> > > The question you have to ask - if your patch causes regression are you
> > > OK tracking/fixing it over the holidays :-) If yes, then yes - we can
> > > put that in v3.13-rc3 to make it work properly on ARMv8.
> > 
> > Damn, that was a good argument.
> > After thinking more about it, I think that I, or a member of my team,
> > can actually fix possible bugs during the holidays. Especially
> > considering that the patch doesn't alter the behavior of PV guests.
> > 
> > So in short, yes :)
> 
> Great <evil laughther>! Could you repost it with the description changes?
> Or if you OK with the changes I had proposed - just tell me "yes" and I will
> alter it.

I am OK with all the changes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/