[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201312141950.09447.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 19:50:09 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC platform files
On Saturday 14 December 2013, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> >
> > Conceptually it might be cleaner to write a separate driver, for example
> > in drivers/power/restart, than plugging the functionality into
> > the watchdog driver, at least if you don't want it in architecture
> > or platform code. The xgene restart driver is a good example.
> >
>
> Moving it to a new power/restart driver seems reasonable to me, I'm
> really just looking for a home for it, I would have preferred a
> hardware with reset in a separate register though.
>
> I now plan to remove it for v5 and submit a separate driver.
I still think it's better to leave it in the watchdog driver: This
driver attaches to the watchdog device, and adding a separate driver
for reset means we have to trick the core Linux code into attaching
two drivers to one device in some way, or the device tree has to fake
a second device that doesn't exist in hardware but is only needed
because of Linux implementation details.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists