linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:41:35 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	bilhuang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@...dia.com> wrote:
> Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale
> VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails
> so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if
> we're going to support voltage scaling.

But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/