linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RXRPC]: do not unlock unheld spinlock in rxrpc_connect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29753.1387382915@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:08:35 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RXRPC]: do not unlock unheld spinlock in rxrpc_connect_exclusive()

Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru> wrote:

> If rx->conn is not NULL, rxrpc_connect_exclusive() does not
> acquire the transport's client lock, but it still releases it.
> 
> The patch adds locking of the spinlock to this path.
> 
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>

Looks good, thanks!  I've added it to my AFS branch.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/