[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131218194025.GA8797@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:40:25 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 7/7] mm: thp: introduce compound_head_put_tail(),
change get_futex_key() to use it
On 12/18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:20:08PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > +struct page *compound_head_put_tail(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page_head;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + if (!PageTail(page))
> > + return page;
> > +
> > + page_head = compound_trans_head(page);
> > +
> > + if (!__compound_tail_refcounted(page_head)) {
>
> This barrier is missing a comment describing the ordering and the
> pairing.
Yes, and this function lacks other comments it needs, they should be
copy-and-past'ed from the very similar __put_page_tail().
But I am going to unify them later if this series passes the review,
can't the comments wait till then?
OTOH, I won't mind to send v2 with the additional comment about this
rmb() at least. Or perhaps I should simply add /* See the comments in
__put_page_tail() */ into the new helper.
OK. But I'll wait for other reviews first.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists