[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131218195018.GA9290@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:50:19 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 4/7] mm: thp: turn put_compound_page() into
__put_page_tail()
On 12/18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 08:19:58PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -247,7 +242,7 @@ bool __get_page_tail(struct page *page)
> > bool got;
> > struct page *page_head = compound_trans_head(page);
> >
> > - /* Ref to put_compound_page() comment. */
> > + /* Ref to __put_page_tail() comment. */
> > if (!__compound_tail_refcounted(page_head)) {
> > smp_rmb();
> > if (likely(PageTail(page))) {
>
> What code is this against, my local tree doesn't have that smp_rmb().
This is against -mm code.
> This suggests its a recent patch; which is good since then we can still
> drop it and wait for people to send one with a proper comment in.
put_compound_page() explains this barrier, this is what "Ref" above means,
I guess.
To remind, I think we can do more cleanups here.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists