[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219194340.GB1443@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:43:40 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Danny Huang <dahuang@...dia.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] misc: fuse: Add efuse driver for Tegra
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:20:01PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 10:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:54:30PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>
> >> + pr_info("Tegra Revision: %s SKU: %d CPU Process: %d Core Process: %d\n",
> >> + tegra_revision_name[sku_info->revision],
> >> + sku_info->sku_id, sku_info->cpu_process_id,
> >> + sku_info->core_process_id);
> >
> > Why pollute the kernel log with this type of thing? Who really needs
> > it?
>
> We already print this; I guess this series is just moving where that
> happens. It has proved useful to me in the past so I know which chip rev
> I'm using, but I guess if this all gets exported to sysfs somewhere else
> in this series, I could just go read those files in the future...
I don't see this being exported anywhere else, or at least, if it is, it
sure isn't being documented...
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists