[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMo8BfJY0rGLyeOwjmrzRw4h2AedF33D3iPXDe+umHDXt5=nQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:47:11 +0400
From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/40] alpha: Replace __get_cpu_var
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
[...]
> 5. Assignment to a per cpu variable
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, y)
> __get_cpu_var(y) = x;
>
> Converts to
>
> this_cpu_write(y, x);
Doesn't it actually convert to __this_cpu_write(y, x); as there were
no atomicity in the original assignment?
--
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists