[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219150226.GH16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:02:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 04/71] itrace: Infrastructure for instruction flow
tracing units
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:49:42PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > Or the interface and implementation of BTS support in the kernel
> > discourage its use and that is why it is so rarely used.
>
> I never heard complains about it. It's a simple dump of from/to address couples.
> I just think nobody take the time to develop userspace tooling to exploit it.
> But it's famous slowness might have had a bad influence on this. And may be
> also the fact that it's very architecture specific. AMD doesn't support BTS if I recall
> correctly. Or may be it has its own different implementation?
No AMD doesn't do anything like that.
There was some attempt to cure some of the wobblies:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/8/154
But people never pursued that.
That said, if people want overwrite mode to work for PT we'd need to fix
the same thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists