[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131219151024.GI16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:10:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 04/71] itrace: Infrastructure for instruction flow
tracing units
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:30:53PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> So I'd like to steer away from the ways in which hardware can be broken
> and talk about a usable interface, to begin with.
Just dump it into the regular one buffer like I outlined.
That said; we very much need to have at least two architectures
implemented for any of this code to move.
But we cannot ignore the hardware trainwreck; we cannot shape our
interface around something that's utterly broken.
Some hardware is just too broken to support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists