[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1312191043280.984-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:45:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] drivers: usb: Include appropriate header file in
hcd.h
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> Include header file include/linux/usb.h in include/linux/usb/hcd.h
> because structures usb_device, usb_host_config and usb_interface have
> their definitions in include/linux/usb.h.
>
> This eliminates the following warning in include/linux/usb/hcd.h:
> include/linux/usb/hcd.h:311:44: warning: ‘struct usb_device’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> include/linux/usb/hcd.h:412:10: warning: ‘struct usb_host_config’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> include/linux/usb/hcd.h:614:9: warning: ‘struct usb_interface’ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
Where does this problem show up?
Any file that include linux/usb/hcd.h should include linux/usb.h first.
IMO it would be better to fix the source files that don't do the
includes properly.
Of course, people have varying opinions on this issue. As far as I
know, there is no fixed policy in the kernel about nested includes.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists