[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B27D48.9030703@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:59:52 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/rmap: fix BUG at rmap_walk
On 12/18/2013 11:29 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> PageLocked is not required by page_referenced_anon() and there is not
>> >any assertion before, commit 37f093cdf introduced this extra BUG_ON()
> There are two callsites shrink_active_list and page_check_references()
> of page_referenced(). shrink_active_list and its callee won't lock anonymous
> page, however, page_check_references() is called with anonymous page
> lock held in shrink_page_list. So page_check_references case need
> specail handling.
This explanation seems to be based on current observed behaviour.
I think it would be easier if you could point out the actual code in each
function that requires a page to be locked, once we have that we don't have
to care about what the callers currently do.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists