[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iouke288.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:32:39 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:30:47 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:00:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> - if (verbose > 3)
>> - perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
>> + if (use_browser == 0) {
>> + if (verbose > 3)
>> + perf_session__fprintf(session, stdout);
>>
>> - if (verbose > 2)
>> - perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
>> + if (verbose > 2)
>> + perf_session__fprintf_dsos(session, stdout);
>>
>> - if (dump_trace) {
>> - perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
>> - return 0;
>> + if (dump_trace) {
>> + perf_session__fprintf_nr_events(session, stdout);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> }
>
> This should be in a different patch, one that is related just to
> dump_trace, i.e. if -D, aka dump_trace (right?) is enabled, then
> probably we won't be initializing the TUI/GUI, no?
Yes, the dump_trace will make use_browser = 0. So I just moved it under
the if (use_browser == 0).
>
> So having a patch that deals just with conversions of fprintf ->
> pr_{err,etc} and another that deals with dump_trace related seems to be
> the best course of action.
Okay, I'll split this into two.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists