[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eh58e21p.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:36:34 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf report: Use pr_*() functions if possible
Hi Jiri,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:31:54 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:00:06PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>>
>> There're some places printing a message to stdout/err directly. It
>> should be converted to use proper error printing functions instead.
>>
>> If it's not possible, just do it when --stdio was enabled only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>
> Maybe it'd be worthwhile to factor perf_session__fprintf*
> functions so the info could end up in the log window.
I thought about it too. And then considered something like below:
FILE *sfp = open_memstream(&ptr, &size);
perf_session__fprintf*(session, sfp, ...);
fclose(sfp);
perf_log_add(ptr);
fprintf(orig_fp, "%s", ptr);
free(ptr);
What do you think?
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Thanks!
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists