linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v2 03/13] PCI, pci-label: release allocated ACPI object on error recovery path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 03:01:55 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 03/13] PCI, pci-label: release allocated ACPI object on error recovery path

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:22:22 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Function dsm_get_label() leaks the returned ACPI object if
> > obj->package.count is not 2, so fix the possible memory leak.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Rafael, if you want to take these through your tree, feel free.

I'm going to do that, thanks!

> I'm guessing it probably makes sense to keep the whole series together.

Agreed.

> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci-label.c |   12 ++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
> > index d51f45a..f6e01a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
> > @@ -233,11 +233,7 @@ dsm_get_label(acpi_handle handle, int func,
> >                 return -1;
> >
> >         obj = (union acpi_object *)output->pointer;
> > -
> > -       switch (obj->type) {
> > -       case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
> > -               if (obj->package.count != 2)
> > -                       break;
> > +       if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE && obj->package.count == 2) {
> >                 len = obj->package.elements[0].integer.value;
> >                 if (buf) {
> >                         if (attribute == ACPI_ATTR_INDEX_SHOW)
> > @@ -250,10 +246,10 @@ dsm_get_label(acpi_handle handle, int func,
> >                 }
> >                 kfree(output->pointer);
> >                 return len;
> > -       break;
> > -       default:
> > -               kfree(output->pointer);
> >         }
> > +
> > +       kfree(output->pointer);
> > +
> >         return -1;
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/