| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1651441.C2UQleWVoy@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 02:00:40 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume
On Friday, December 20, 2013 09:26:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There are cases where cpufreq_add_dev() may fail for some CPUs during resume.
> With the current code we will still have sysfs cpufreq files for such CPUs, and
> struct cpufreq_policy would be already freed for them. Hence any operation on
> those sysfs files would result in kernel warnings.
>
> To fix this, lets remove those sysfs files or put the associated kobject in case
> of such errors. Also, to make it simple lets remove the sysfs links from all the
> CPUs (except policy->cpu) during suspend as that operation wouldn't result with a
> loss of sysfs file permissions. And so we will create those links during resume
> as well.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Queued up for the next PM pull request, thanks!
Bjorn, can you please check if the pm-cpufreq branch of the linux-pm.git tree
fixes the problem that you have reported without causing any new breakage to
happen?
Rafael
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02d534d..fab042e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -845,8 +845,7 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> - unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev,
> - bool frozen)
> + unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -877,11 +876,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> }
> }
>
> - /* Don't touch sysfs links during light-weight init */
> - if (!frozen)
> - ret = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq");
> -
> - return ret;
> + return sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &policy->kobj, "cpufreq");
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -926,6 +921,27 @@ err_free_policy:
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + struct kobject *kobj;
> + struct completion *cmp;
> +
> + down_read(&policy->rwsem);
> + kobj = &policy->kobj;
> + cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
> + up_read(&policy->rwsem);
> + kobject_put(kobj);
> +
> + /*
> + * We need to make sure that the underlying kobj is
> + * actually not referenced anymore by anybody before we
> + * proceed with unloading.
> + */
> + pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
> + wait_for_completion(cmp);
> + pr_debug("wait complete\n");
> +}
> +
> static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
> @@ -986,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
> list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
> if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {
> read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> - ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev, frozen);
> + ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev);
> up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1096,7 +1112,10 @@ err_get_freq:
> if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
> cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
> err_set_policy_cpu:
> + if (frozen)
> + cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
> cpufreq_policy_free(policy);
> +
> nomem_out:
> up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
>
> @@ -1118,7 +1137,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
> }
>
> static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> - unsigned int old_cpu, bool frozen)
> + unsigned int old_cpu)
> {
> struct device *cpu_dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -1126,10 +1145,6 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> /* first sibling now owns the new sysfs dir */
> cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpumask_any_but(policy->cpus, old_cpu));
>
> - /* Don't touch sysfs files during light-weight tear-down */
> - if (frozen)
> - return cpu_dev->id;
> -
> sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> ret = kobject_move(&policy->kobj, &cpu_dev->kobj);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -1196,7 +1211,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
> if (!frozen)
> sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> } else if (cpus > 1) {
> - new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, frozen);
> + new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
> if (new_cpu >= 0) {
> update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
>
> @@ -1218,8 +1233,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> int ret;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> - struct kobject *kobj;
> - struct completion *cmp;
>
> read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> @@ -1249,22 +1262,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> - if (!frozen) {
> - down_read(&policy->rwsem);
> - kobj = &policy->kobj;
> - cmp = &policy->kobj_unregister;
> - up_read(&policy->rwsem);
> - kobject_put(kobj);
> -
> - /*
> - * We need to make sure that the underlying kobj is
> - * actually not referenced anymore by anybody before we
> - * proceed with unloading.
> - */
> - pr_debug("waiting for dropping of refcount\n");
> - wait_for_completion(cmp);
> - pr_debug("wait complete\n");
> - }
> + if (!frozen)
> + cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy);
>
> /*
> * Perform the ->exit() even during light-weight tear-down,
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists