lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 22 Dec 2013 02:01:35 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend

On Friday, December 20, 2013 02:18:22 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, December 20, 2013 09:43:16 AM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On 10 December 2013 14:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > To put devices into low power state during system suspend, it is convenient
> > > for some runtime PM supported power domains, subsystems and drivers to have
> > > the option of re-using and invoking the runtime PM callbacks from their system
> > > PM callbacks.
> > >
> > > The benefit is that we don't need to implement wrapper functions which
> > > handles runtime PM resourses, typically called from both runtime PM and system
> > > PM callbacks.
> > >
> > > Some new helper macros for defining the PM callbacks are added.
> > >
> > > SET_PM_RUNTIME_PM_OPS; to define runtime PM callbacks for CONFIG_PM instead of
> > > CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.
> > >
> > > SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS; to define common late/early system PM callbacks,
> > > same approach is applicable to the existing SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS which
> > > defines common suspend/resume system PM callbacks.
> > >
> > > A minor fix was needed for the platform bus, which runtime PM callbacks are set
> > > to the pm_generic_runtime_suspend|resume functions. These were implemented only
> > > for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME and thus the platform bus prevented driver's runtime PM
> > > callbacks to be invoked when only CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was used. We move them into
> > > CONFIG_PM to resolve the problem.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >         Updated commit messages to try to better reflect the changes.
> > >         Removed the below patches from this patch set. Let's leave those to be
> > >         addressed separately, if needed.
> > >         - PM / Sleep: Add pm_generic functions to re-use runtime PM callbacks
> > >         - drm/exynos: Convert to suspend_late/resume_early callbacks for fimc
> > >
> > >
> > > Ulf Hansson (3):
> > >   PM / Runtime: Add second macro for definition of runtime PM callbacks
> > >   PM / Runtime: Implement the pm_generic_runtime functions for
> > >     CONFIG_PM
> > >   PM / Sleep: Add macro to define common late/early system PM callbacks
> > >
> > >  drivers/base/power/generic_ops.c |    4 ++--
> > >  include/linux/pm.h               |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/linux/pm_runtime.h       |   12 ++++++++----
> > >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > >
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Just wanted to send a kind ping on this patchset.
> > 
> > Would be nice to try to conclude on the way forward after the quite
> > long and good discussions we had around this topic.
> 
> Sorry, I was traveling last week.  I'm processing my backlog now, hopefully
> I'll get to your patches shortly.

So I've just queued them up for 3.14.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ