[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131224133756.GA10477@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:37:56 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] sctp: Consolidate and ratelimit deprecation
warnings
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:55:16PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 08:29 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > The SCTP protocol has several deprecation warnings in its setsockopt path that
> > can be triggered by unprivlidged users. Since these are not ratelimited, we can
> > spam the logs quite easily here. Since these are all deprecation warnings, and
> > that type of warning isn't uncommon in the rest of the kernel, lets make a
> > common pr_warn_deprecated macro to produce somewhat generalized ratelimited
> > deprecation warnings easily
> [...]
>
> No objection to these changes, but I think deprecation warnings should
> log at least the command name and maybe also the pid of the caller.
>
I didn't change the contents of the strings in this patch, I just wanted to
avoid log spamming, but I think adding caller pid/name is a good idea. I'll do
that in a followon patch after the holidays
Neil
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists