linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1614824.4yERnS53EQ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 24 Dec 2013 01:35:20 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] cpufreq: remove sysfs files for CPU which failed to come back after resume

On Monday, December 23, 2013 09:15:40 PM viresh kumar wrote:
> On Monday 23 December 2013 05:12 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > That would be great.  This could be just me.  I am quite good at
> > breaking stuff.
> 
> No its not you. While we tried to make sure everything is preserved,
> few special things still stayed out :)
> 
> And they are solved with this patch, log should be good enough to give
> proper reasoning:
> 
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:51:54 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: preserve user_policy across suspend/resume
> 
> In __cpufreq_add_dev() we are reinitializing user_policy with default values and
> hence would loose values of user_policy.{min|max|policy|governor} fields.
> 
> Preserve them by not overriding these for suspend/resume.

OK

Can you please combine this with the patch you sent previously (if that one
is still necessary) and resubmit with a new subject?

Rafael


> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 16d7b4a..c5c3dac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -839,9 +839,6 @@ static void cpufreq_init_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> 
>  	/* set default policy */
>  	ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
> -	policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
> -	policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
> -
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_debug("setting policy failed\n");
>  		if (cpufreq_driver->exit)
> @@ -1069,8 +1066,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
>  	 */
>  	cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask);
> 
> -	policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
> -	policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
> +	if (!frozen) {
> +		policy->user_policy.min = policy->min;
> +		policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
> +	}
> 
>  	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
>  				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
> @@ -1101,6 +1100,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif,
> 
>  	cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
> 
> +	if (!frozen) {
> +		policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy;
> +		policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor;
> +	}
> +
>  	kobject_uevent(&policy->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
>  	up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
> 
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/