[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVN=sxHxUY_0c9xWKw3nXhj60UeSjvFTHs52zHNEAg__4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:30:58 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: blk-mq: support draining mq queue
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:18:56AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> blk_mq_drain_queue() is introduced so that we can drain
>> mq queue during cleanup queue.
>>
>> Also don't accept new requests any more if queue is marked
>> as dying.
>
> blk_cleanup_queue is a call from the LLDD, there is no need to make
Some drivers don't have LLDD, like null_blk, virtio-blk, ...
> it handle the MQ case. However given that there might be a lot of
> code shared between blk_cleanup_queue and blk_mq_cleanup_queue an
> internal helper might be useful.
So there are two ways to implement block API for MQ: one is to try to
adapt current block APIs for blk mq driver, another one is to always
reinvent new blk_mq_* APIs for blk mq driver.
Looks you prefer to the 2nd one, and this patch takes the 1st way.
Actually the below block APIs
blk_get_request()
blk_put_request()
blk_execute_rq_nowait()
blk_register_queue()
blk_unregister_queue()
blk_insert_flush()
....
have been there to support MQ.
One problem about the 2nd way is that MQ drivers may become a bit
ugly if the driver still need to support traditional request/bio mechanism.
So I think blk_mq_drain_queue can be called for MQ too.
>
>> + if (q->mq_ops) {
>> + blk_mq_drain_queue(q);
>> + } else {
>> + spin_lock_irq(lock);
>> + __blk_drain_queue(q, true);
>> + queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, q);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(lock);
>> + }
>
> Why doesn't the mq case set QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD here?
Looks DEAD flag is set to prevent request_fn from being called,
and there is no request_fn for MQ, so I don't set it and QUEUE_FLAG_DYING
has been checked in blk_mq_queue_enter() already.
But we can do it easily.
>
>> -static void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> +static void __blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q,
>> + bool force_drain)
>> {
>> bool drain;
>>
>> + if (force_drain)
>> + goto do_drain;
>> +
>> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> drain = !q->bypass_depth++;
>> queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_BYPASS, q);
>> @@ -134,6 +141,7 @@ static void blk_mq_freeze_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> if (!drain)
>> return;
>>
>> + do_drain:
>> while (true) {
>> s64 count;
>
> This begs to be split into two functions, one that forces the drain, and
> once that wraps it.
Sounds a good idea, and I will do it in v1.
>
> Also blk_execute_rq_nowait now needs to check the dying case for MQ as
> well.
In this patch the dying flag is only checked in blk_mq_queue_enter()
which is called in allocating request path, so once the request is
allocated, we just simply wait for its completion in blk_mq_drain_queue().
Even for non-MQ case, looks blk_queue_dying(q) is checked to avoid
being freed early before running queue, I am not sure if it is good
because the I/O might or can have been completed. And it isn't a problem
for MQ because this request can't be reused when dying is set.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists