linux-kernel - [PATCH, RFC 03/30] DAC960: remove sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1388664474-1710039-4-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu,  2 Jan 2014 13:07:27 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH, RFC 03/30] DAC960: remove sleep_on usage

sleep_on and its variants are going away. The use of sleep_on() in
DAC960_V2_ExecuteUserCommand seems to be bogus because the command
by the time we get there, the command has completed already and
we just enter the timeout. Based on this interpretation, I concluded
that we can replace it with a simple msleep(1000) and rearrange the
code around it slightly.

The interruptible_sleep_on_timeout in DAC960_gam_ioctl seems equivalent
to the race-free version using wait_event_interruptible_timeout.
I left the driver to return -EINTR rather than -ERESTARTSYS to preserve
the timeout behavior.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
---
 drivers/block/DAC960.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/DAC960.c b/drivers/block/DAC960.c
index eb39501..125d845 100644
--- a/drivers/block/DAC960.c
+++ b/drivers/block/DAC960.c
@@ -6411,12 +6411,12 @@ static bool DAC960_V2_ExecuteUserCommand(DAC960_Controller_T *Controller,
 					.ScatterGatherSegments[0]
 					.SegmentByteCount =
 	    CommandMailbox->ControllerInfo.DataTransferSize;
-	  DAC960_ExecuteCommand(Command);
-	  while (Controller->V2.NewControllerInformation->PhysicalScanActive)
-	    {
-	      DAC960_ExecuteCommand(Command);
-	      sleep_on_timeout(&Controller->CommandWaitQueue, HZ);
-	    }
+	  while (1) {
+	    DAC960_ExecuteCommand(Command);
+	    if (!Controller->V2.NewControllerInformation->PhysicalScanActive)
+		break;
+	    msleep(1000);
+	  }
 	  DAC960_UserCritical("Discovery Completed\n", Controller);
  	}
     }
@@ -7035,18 +7035,16 @@ static long DAC960_gam_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int Request,
 		ErrorCode = -EFAULT;
 		break;
 	}
-	while (Controller->V2.HealthStatusBuffer->StatusChangeCounter
-	       == HealthStatusBuffer.StatusChangeCounter &&
-	       Controller->V2.HealthStatusBuffer->NextEventSequenceNumber
-	       == HealthStatusBuffer.NextEventSequenceNumber)
-	  {
-	    interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&Controller->HealthStatusWaitQueue,
-					   DAC960_MonitoringTimerInterval);
-	    if (signal_pending(current)) {
-	    	ErrorCode = -EINTR;
-	    	break;
-	    }
-	  }
+	ErrorCode = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(Controller->HealthStatusWaitQueue,
+			!(Controller->V2.HealthStatusBuffer->StatusChangeCounter
+			    == HealthStatusBuffer.StatusChangeCounter &&
+			  Controller->V2.HealthStatusBuffer->NextEventSequenceNumber
+			    == HealthStatusBuffer.NextEventSequenceNumber),
+			DAC960_MonitoringTimerInterval);
+	if (ErrorCode == -ERESTARTSYS) {
+		ErrorCode = -EINTR;
+		break;
+	}
 	if (copy_to_user(GetHealthStatus.HealthStatusBuffer,
 			 Controller->V2.HealthStatusBuffer,
 			 sizeof(DAC960_V2_HealthStatusBuffer_T)))
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/