[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C5891A.7040603@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:43:22 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 11/18] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM for event channels
(v2)
On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
>
> PVH is a PV guest with a twist - there are certain things
> that work in it like HVM and some like PV. There is
> a similar mode - PVHVM where we run in HVM mode with
> PV code enabled - and this patch explores that.
>
> The most notable PV interfaces are the XenBus and event channels.
>
> We will piggyback on how the event channel mechanism is
> used in PVHVM - that is we want the normal native IRQ mechanism
> and we will install a vector (hvm callback) for which we
> will call the event channel mechanism.
>
> This means that from a pvops perspective, we can use
> native_irq_ops instead of the Xen PV specific. Albeit in the
> future we could support pirq_eoi_map. But that is
> a feature request that can be shared with PVHVM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists