[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52C59068.1040603@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:14:32 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/18] xen/pvh: Update E820 to work with PVH (v2)
On 01/01/14 04:35, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@...cle.com>
>
> In xen_add_extra_mem() we can skip updating P2M as it's managed
> by Xen. PVH maps the entire IO space, but only RAM pages need
> to be repopulated.
So this looks minimal but I can't work out what PVH actually needs to do
here. This code really doesn't need to be made any more confusing.
I don't understand why the guest hasn't been supplied with sensible
memory map that we can use as-is without playing all these games?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists