linux-kernel - Re: About Mail-Followup-To and Mutt [Was: Re: [ARM] Fix kernel compile error: drivers/crypto/ixp4xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140102175134.GE31886@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 17:51:34 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Gerhard Sittig <gsi@...x.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
	Christian Hohnstaedt <chohnstaedt@...ominate.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: About Mail-Followup-To and Mutt [Was: Re: [ARM] Fix kernel
 compile error: drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:42:52AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> (using the lists and subscribe commands). And note that there are lists
> that consider using MFT to be good, ISTR that it applies to
> *@...ts.debian.org, but cannot currently find a reference to support
> that claim. The problem is that using MFT only works if all recipents
> are using and respecting it.

No, Debian specifically wants replies to be sent to the list only but
it's not really related to Mail-Followup-To - I don't think there's a
general feeling on that within Debian but ICBW.  The thing about reply
to list predates the invention of MFT.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)