[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25291.1388769299@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:14:59 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mei: mei-amt-version: remove unneeded call of mei_deinit()
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
>
> Building mei-amt-version.o triggers a GCC warning:
> Documentation/misc-devices/mei/mei-amt-version.c: In function 'main':
> Documentation/misc-devices/mei/mei-amt-version.c:103:5: warning: 'acmd.fd' is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> if (cl->fd != -1)
> ^
> Documentation/misc-devices/mei/mei-amt-version.c:443:21: note: 'acmd.fd' was declared here
> struct amt_host_if acmd;
> ^
>
> GCC is correct. See, the call chain that GCC detects must be
> main()
> amt_host_if_init()
> mei_init()
> mei_deinit()
>
> But when we enter mei_deinit() struct amt_host_if acmd is still
> unitialized. That makes the test for (effectively) amt_host_if->mei_cl->fd
> bogus.
>
> But it turns out that call of mei_deinit() isn't needed at all. All of
> the members of mei_cl will be set later in mei_init() and none will be
> used before they are set. So we can simply drop this call of
> mei_deinit().
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Builds without warning for me.
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists