[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140103230826.GB13489@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:08:26 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
Cc: "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"bpringlemeir@...ps.com" <bpringlemeir@...ps.com>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Huan Wang <Huan.Wang@...escale.com>,
Jingchang Lu <jingchang.lu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 RFC] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 09:16:06AM +0000, Li.Xiubo@...escale.com wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 RFC] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
> >
> > Hi Xiubo,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 01:24:21PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > > +
> > > +static inline int fsl_pwm_calculate_default_ps(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
> > > + enum fsl_pwm_clk index)
> > > +{
> >
> > Why do you declare this (and other module-local) function as inline?
> > It is usually better let compiler decide if given function should be
> > inlined or not.
> >
>
> Could the compiler know when the given function should be inlined by
> not declare it?
Yes.
> And when will be inlined ?
When it makes sense to do so from compiler's point of view: i.e. it is
smallish or with single call site and there are enough registers, etc,
etc.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists