[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0773adbc0c0f4406ab6df6480d4aef51@BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 05:25:32 +0000
From: "Li.Xiubo@...escale.com" <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"bpringlemeir@...ps.com" <bpringlemeir@...ps.com>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Huan Wang <Huan.Wang@...escale.com>,
Jingchang Lu <jingchang.lu@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv8 RFC] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
> > > > +static inline int fsl_pwm_calculate_default_ps(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc,
> > > > + enum fsl_pwm_clk index)
> > > > +{
> > >
> > > Why do you declare this (and other module-local) function as inline?
> > > It is usually better let compiler decide if given function should be
> > > inlined or not.
> > >
> >
> > Could the compiler know when the given function should be inlined by
> > not declare it?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And when will be inlined ?
>
> When it makes sense to do so from compiler's point of view: i.e. it is
> smallish or with single call site and there are enough registers, etc,
> etc.
>
Well, the inline is not very useful here, I will revise this.
Thanks,
--
Best Regards,
Xiubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists