linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C85B34.6040001@sr71.net>
Date:	Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:04:20 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
>> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
>> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
>> other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
>> arch-specific menus.
> 
> You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture
> versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...

I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away.  I can't find any
reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code.  Is there some
/proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
/proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/