linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Jan 2014 10:33:53 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

Hi Dave,

On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:04:20 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
> >> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> >> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> >> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> >> other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> >> arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture
> > versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...
> 
> I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away.  I can't find any
> reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code.  Is there some
> /proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
> /proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?

I don't know, but if it has gone then it is worth mentioning in the
commit message ... and you did preserve the dependency in the sparc64
case.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped