linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52C8AA3B.5010302@sr71.net>
Date:	Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:41:31 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

On 01/04/2014 03:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away.  I can't find any
>> reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code.  Is there some
>> /proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
>> /proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?
> 
> I don't know, but if it has gone then it is worth mentioning in the
> commit message

Maybe like this? ;)

> There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> /proc interface which was removed in 2007.

I guess I could call it out a _bit_ more clearly that I removed the
dependency because the code is gone.

> ... and you did preserve the dependency in the sparc64 case.

Ahh, I did.  I'll remove it.  Thanks!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/