linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140105212423.537477040dfc25c98810188e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 5 Jan 2014 21:24:23 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

Hi Dave,

On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:41:31 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2014 03:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know, but if it has gone then it is worth mentioning in the
> > commit message
> 
> Maybe like this? ;)
> 
> > There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> > virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> > /proc interface which was removed in 2007.
> 
> I guess I could call it out a _bit_ more clearly that I removed the
> dependency because the code is gone.

Ah, yes, I must have been half asleep :-)

> > ... and you did preserve the dependency in the sparc64 case.
> 
> Ahh, I did.  I'll remove it.  Thanks!

And that probably confused me as well.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped