lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:28:31 -0800 From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote: >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep >> enabled seqcount methods. >> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch. > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip > tree, which is where the problem came from. No? It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back on Monday to queue these. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists