[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140106101039.GD31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:10:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:28:31PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> >> enabled seqcount methods.
> >>
> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
> > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
> > tree, which is where the problem came from. No?
>
> It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back
> on Monday to queue these.
Done! thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists