[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CB6B1B.4050705@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:48:59 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tools lib traceevent: Add state member to struct
trace_seq
Hi Steve and Jiri,
2014-01-06 PM 11:45, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:38:28 +0100
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> I just thought that it's not so important to print message so keeps the
>>> error internally until it gets printed. But I can be wrong as usual...
>>
>> I think that if she manages to get one of those errors
>> the perf would fail soon anyway.. so it feels better
>> to print it out immediately.
>
> Yeah, using a trace_seq after it has been destroyed is a critical
> failure, and a major bug. A print to the user console should not be a
> problem here. And actually, crashing is not that bad either, as glibc
> does the same with using free() of a freed pointer.
>
> But as this error is major, an unwanted print is minor.
OK, I'll add the WARN_ONCE in the TRACE_SEQ_CHECK then.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists