linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/triggers: A couple minor variable name changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389063069.3040.90.camel@empanada>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:51:09 -0600
From:	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/triggers: A couple minor variable name
 changes

> 
> > > +	enum event_trigger_type tt = ETT_NONE;
> > > +
> > > +	if (__event_trigger_test_discard(file, buffer, event, entry, &tt))
> > > +		trace_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event, irq_flags, pc);
> > 
> > The logic is correct overall, but the way it reads is the opposite of
> > what it used to i.e. it should read 'if you don't discard the event,
> > then do the trace_buffer_unlock_commit' - it works as written because it
> > returns 1 if it didn't discard, which is confusing.
> 
> Hmm, OK, I think you may have convinced me. I'll swap the return values.
> 

Sounds great, thanks!

> I need to write up some trigger tests to make sure they work the same
> before and after this patch.
> 

I'll run the next version through my 'testsuite', which unfortunately is
still manual (one of the many things on my todo list is automate it)..

Tom



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/