[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140107160044.GE4180@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:00:44 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>
Cc: "poeschel@...onage.de" <poeschel@...onage.de>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"gnurou@...il.com" <gnurou@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mcp23s08: Add irq functionality for i2c chips
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:05:48PM +0000, Lars Poeschel wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
>
> This adds interrupt functionality for i2c chips to the driver.
> They can act as a interrupt-controller and generate interrupts, if
> the inputs change.
> This is tested on a mcp23017 chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt | 21 +-
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
> index daa3017..b8376f3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.txt
> @@ -38,12 +38,31 @@ Required device specific properties (only for SPI chips):
> removed.
> - spi-max-frequency = The maximum frequency this chip is able to handle
>
> -Example I2C:
> +Optional properties:
> +- #interrupt-cells : Should be two.
> + - first cell is the pin number
> + - second cell is used to specify flags.
> +- interrupt-controller: Marks the device node as a interrupt controller.
> +NOTE: The interrupt functionality is only supported for i2c versions of the
> +chips yet.
> +
> +Optional device specific properties:
> +- microchip,irq-mirror: Sets the mirror flag in the IOCON register. This causes
> + devices with two interrupt outputs to always trigger both interrupt
> + outputs regardless where the interrupt happened.
> +
When is this useful?
When should it be set and when shouldin't it be?
[...]
> @@ -432,13 +618,21 @@ static int mcp23s08_probe_one(struct mcp23s08 *mcp, struct device *dev,
> /* verify MCP_IOCON.SEQOP = 0, so sequential reads work,
> * and MCP_IOCON.HAEN = 1, so we work with all chips.
> */
> +
> status = mcp->ops->read(mcp, MCP_IOCON);
> if (status < 0)
> goto fail;
> - if ((status & IOCON_SEQOP) || !(status & IOCON_HAEN)) {
> +
> + mirror = of_find_property(mcp->chip.of_node,
> + "microchip,irq-mirror", NULL);
Use of_property_read_bool.
> + if ((status & IOCON_SEQOP) || !(status & IOCON_HAEN) || mirror) {
> /* mcp23s17 has IOCON twice, make sure they are in sync */
> status &= ~(IOCON_SEQOP | (IOCON_SEQOP << 8));
> status |= IOCON_HAEN | (IOCON_HAEN << 8);
> + status &= ~(IOCON_INTPOL | (IOCON_INTPOL << 8));
> + if (mirror)
> + status |= IOCON_MIRROR | (IOCON_MIRROR << 8);
> +
> status = mcp->ops->write(mcp, MCP_IOCON, status);
> if (status < 0)
> goto fail;
> @@ -469,7 +663,17 @@ static int mcp23s08_probe_one(struct mcp23s08 *mcp, struct device *dev,
> goto fail;
> }
>
> + if (mcp->irq &&
> + of_find_property(mcp->chip.of_node, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) {
You could do so here too.
In fact, doesn't the irq-mirror proeprty only make sense if this is an
interrupt controller?
[...]
> @@ -583,6 +789,10 @@ static int mcp230xx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (status == 0)
> kfree(mcp);
>
> + if (client->irq &&
> + of_find_property(mcp->chip.of_node, "interrupt-controller", NULL))
> + mcp23s08_irq_teardown(mcp);
Can you not cache the fact it's an interrupt controller?
Parsing the DT in a teardown path is very odd.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists