[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uFEzOKYjojVop1ouRsJWyeK-rnKH-udBxZcc9fwKCOV6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:12:16 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Excessive WARN()s in Intel 915 driver
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> After all, it's not like there's anything I can do to fix the hardware,
> is there? And it doesn't look like the pipe state mismatch is going to
> go away by itself. Or is this a genuine, fixable, software bug?
These are genuine software bugs - every time one of these WARNs fires
our software tracking and the actual hardware state have diverged,
which eventually will lead to really subtle and hard to reproduce
bugs.
> In any case, wouldn't it be good enough for this message to be
> dev_warn() instead of WARN()?
I really want users to report these issues, and excessive WARNs seems
to be the only way to get those reports. Please boot with
drm.debug=0xe added to your kernel cmdline and reproduce this issues.
Also, which precise kernel are you running? Testing latest -rc is
always recommended, this state checker code is fairly new and gets
constantly extended and bugs fixed ...
Yours, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists