linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: Add Arm Erratum 773769 for Large data RAM latency.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:35:27 -0800
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kgene.kim@...sung.com" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	David Garbett <David.Garbett@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com" 
	<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Add Arm Erratum 773769 for Large data RAM latency.

Nicolas,

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> > No, we're saying to put the work-around in the boot loader, not the kernel.
>>
>> Unfortunately the resume path of the firmware runs from Read Only
>> firmware code (yes, it sucks), so it's not totally trivial to fix. It
>> would be possible for someone to unscrew their write protect switch
>> and update their RO firmware, but that doesn't help the average user.
>
> [...]
>
>> I'd guess that the way forward is:
>>
>> * Land kernel workaround locally in Chromium tree
>>
>> * I'll try to land FW change locally in at least one Chromium branch.
>> If we were to get a new RO build ever (seems unlikely at this point)
>> it would be fixed for upstream kernels.  If we were to get a new RW
>> build (seems unlikely, but at least less unlikely) it would be fixed
>> if someone landed a kernel patch to save/restore this register across
>> suspend/resume.
>>
>> * If Joe Upstream wants to run an upstream kernel on some type of
>> exynos5250 product (Samsung ARM Chromebook, HP Chromebook 11, Nexus 10
>> are the ones I know of) then he will deal with the small number of
>> crashes or figure out a solution.
>
> If Joe Upstream wants to run an upstream kernel, doesn't he have to
> unscrew his write protect switch first, at which point the RO firmware
> can be updated as well?

Actually, no.  You can move your device into dev mode and run any
kernel you want.  You'll get an annoying "you're in dev mode" screen
at every bootup, but otherwise it works just fine.

Going into dev mode requires some special keystrokes at bootup and a
wipe of your hard disk but no screwdrivers.


-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/