[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=EsaBPdF3wYsa2rEdjcpPagbhPcxWw1_PA=yVLDnjRiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:56:28 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 Resend] cpufreq: create cpufreq_generic_get() routine
cc'ng Russell/LAKML/Fengguang..
On 9 January 2014 14:08, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> This patch breaks a bunch of ARM boards. In particular, the following
> defconfigs no longer build:
That's really bad, Rafael will scold me again :)
> assabet_defconfig
> badge4_defconfig
> cerfcube_defconfig
> collie_defconfig
> h3600_defconfig
> hackkit_defconfig
> jornada720_defconfig
> lart_defconfig
> neponset_defconfig
> pleb_defconfig
> shannon_defconfig
> simpad_defconfig
>
> Error is:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `cpufreq_generic_get':
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:189: undefined reference to `clk_get_rate'
>
> Seems like this needs to be guarded by HAVE_CLK?
Naah.. After some investigation I found this:
- We already have dummy implementations of clk routines in case
CONFIG_HAVE_CLK is not defined (I added them long back).
- There is one thing common among all above defconfigs, all
belong to SA1100 family :)
- And the problem is: SA1100 wanted to define its own clk routines
and selects CLKDEV_LOOKUP (which enables HAVE_CLK), but it
doesn't implement all clk routines. Which is *wrong*.
So, actually this patch brought an _existing_ bug in limelight. And
this should be fixed by adding dummy or meaningful implementation
of missing clk routines.
@Russell: If above looks correct then can you please communicate
what should we do here? I don't really know what exactly these
routines should have, simply a copy of dummy routines from clk.h
or some meaningful stuff. So, maybe you can write a patch, otherwise
let me know what to write and I will give it a try.
@Rafael: Please *don't* revert this patch, its not my fault this time :)
@Fengguang: Would it make sense to add build tests for all ARM
defconfigs in your build system? I thought its already there :)
That way I can always be sure that my stuff (would be helpful for
others as well though) isn't breaking build (Atleast) for any platform.
Thanks.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists