linux-kernel - Re: Broken locking in leds-lp5523.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK5ve-K3oz+cY=g025gnjYzCTmUm2AVV8Tcc9Zg+Sb2jBu1fOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:51:25 -0800
From:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
To:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"rpurdie@...ys.net" <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, milo kim <milo.kim@...com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>
Subject: Re: Broken locking in leds-lp5523.c

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 01:32:15 Bryan Wu wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > There's some locking weirdness, and few missing comments in
>> > lp5523 driver.
>> >
>> > Now, this is untested patch from my reverse-engineering. I
>> > hope I understood things right...
>> >
>> > In particular, there's unbalanced unlock in
>> > lp5523_update_program_memory, and
>> > lp5523_update_program_memory needs to be protected by the
>> > lock.
>> >
>> > Comments? Does someone maintain this?
>>
>> Actually the locking issue was fixed in my for-next branch,
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/linux-led
>> s.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0d70bdb957cde2c25a4b3e4c93d0d33403
>> 795be9
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Bryan
>>
>
> Now, with linus tree lp5523 driver does not work without above
> commit on Nokia N900 device. I think that commit should go to
> 3.13 and stable... What do you think?
>

OK, can you just apply this fix on Linus tree and verify it on N900?
If only this fix will make N900 LED work, I will send out to Linus as
a critical fix for 3.13 as well as stable tree. Because there 2 more
patches for LED comes from Milo also fixed something and this patch
probably depends on them.

Please help to verify.

Thanks,
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/