[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hPnCud=MWpsCMNZmK_BwVV8WZHOs7=GQMhymgkv-gNkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:33:29 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net: make tcp_cleanup_rbuf private
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>> net_dma was the only external user so this can become local to tcp.c
>> again.
> ...
>> -void tcp_cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *sk, int copied)
>> +static void cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *sk, int copied)
>
> I would vote to keep the tcp_ prefix. In the TCP code base that is the
> more common idiom, even for internal/static TCP functions, and
> personally I find it easier to read and work with in stack traces,
> etc. My 2 cents.
>
Ok. It was cleanup_rbuf() in a former life, but one vote for leaving
the name as is is enough for me.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists